I am a masters swimmer who particularly enjoys the 200 and 400 medley events.  As the new season begins, each member on our team sets his goals for 2011-2012.  Suppose for a second that our captain should tell me that my goals are too modest, that instead they should be to beat Michael Phelps and train in consequence, that anything less would be viewed as failure and evidence that I was a slacker.  I love swimming, I love training, but I think beating Michael is not in my cards.
Yet the fiction of quasi full debt service (quasi because of the 21% haircut proposed on 2011-2014 maturities) is maintained. This is proving little incentive for the Greeks (why should we sacrifice for an unattainable goal?), the creditor banks (why should we recapitalize now if we might drag this for another year) and the rest of the EU (Germany 
A better strategy would be to accept reality and provide the basis for a successful workout.Greece 
Such a strategy would rest on two pillars: the first would be to reinforce those European banks that need it, most likely via capital subscriptions from the European Financial Stabilization Fund. Bank valuations are so depressed now that relying on private capital is not feasible, except perhaps for a fraction of the amounts needed. In this regard, it is crucial that the terms of the EFSF capital injection not be punitive, and this for two reasons: banks can be castigated for making bad loans but not so much for buying their country’s sovereign debts, and it is important for the future that private investors want to buy bank stocks. TARP is a good example to follow.
The second pillar of the strategy would be to provide an incentive forGreece Greece Greece to try hard 
It is the ancient Greek mathematician, Archimedes, who said “give me a fixed point and I will raise the world with a lever”. What modern Greeks need is a lever to raise their energies, i.e. a reasonable baseline with a clear upside and downside. And what I need is for Michael to give me a one minute head start, on the 200 that is.
Today, the Greek public debt represents anywhere between 160% and 170% of GDP, and with GDP shrinking hard, that percentage is more likely to rise than to drop.  The Greeks know it, the EU knows it and creditors know it too.  In fact, Greece 
Yet the fiction of quasi full debt service (quasi because of the 21% haircut proposed on 2011-2014 maturities) is maintained. This is proving little incentive for the Greeks (why should we sacrifice for an unattainable goal?), the creditor banks (why should we recapitalize now if we might drag this for another year) and the rest of the EU (
A better strategy would be to accept reality and provide the basis for a successful workout.
Such a strategy would rest on two pillars: the first would be to reinforce those European banks that need it, most likely via capital subscriptions from the European Financial Stabilization Fund. Bank valuations are so depressed now that relying on private capital is not feasible, except perhaps for a fraction of the amounts needed. In this regard, it is crucial that the terms of the EFSF capital injection not be punitive, and this for two reasons: banks can be castigated for making bad loans but not so much for buying their country’s sovereign debts, and it is important for the future that private investors want to buy bank stocks. TARP is a good example to follow.
The second pillar of the strategy would be to provide an incentive for
It is the ancient Greek mathematician, Archimedes, who said “give me a fixed point and I will raise the world with a lever”. What modern Greeks need is a lever to raise their energies, i.e. a reasonable baseline with a clear upside and downside. And what I need is for Michael to give me a one minute head start, on the 200 that is.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment