Thursday, November 8, 2012

The Gallois Report



One learns from experience at any age.  Look at me.  Having calculated that the odds of two consecutive once-in-a-century mega-storms were close to zero, I declined to purchase a standby generator.  Wrong.  The generator guy is coming by tomorrow.

In France and the US, politicians have become experts at kicking the can down the road, until they hit a wall and need to come up with Plan B.  In this country, we had the Simpson-Bowles Commission; its report was quickly buried but, within the next twelve months, it will likely resurface as the US margin of maneuver is squeezed and public finances are in dire need of fixing.  If our politicians succeed, they should send their French brethren a copy of their recipe, because France could learn from it.

Likewise, France commissioned a report on industrial competitivess from Louis Gallois, one of its most prominent grand patrons[1].  Mr. Gallois just delivered it today.  Having lamented the decline of the US industry, our politicians would do well to read his report, for even if our problems are not quite the same as the French, there is enough commonality to make it required reading.  The diagnostic of the French industry’s weaknesses and falling from grace is particularly instructive, because we could be next on that slippery slope. 

Generally, Mr. Gallois recommends a “competitiveness shock” where key measures are applied quickly rather than being diluted over a decade.  He also stresses that French society must debate the reforms and come together on a plan which will carry the conviction that sacrifices and benefits will be fairly shared.  Indeed, the plan is as much about mutual confidence as it is about specific measures.  

Such convergence of efforts and ultimate rewards (you think of Reagan’s motto “trust but verify”) calls for lower social charges for both employers and employees (1.5% of GDP), greater participation of employees and union representatives in the policy deliberations of large corporations and a robust support for small and medium-sized companies.

Although Mr. Gallois is reputed to be left-leaning, he sees a key contribution of the state as doing no harm.  In his view, any significant new law or governmental decree should be accompanied by a document estimating its impact on industrial competitiveness, and recommendations as to reduce adverse consequences, if any.  The state should also refrain from changing key provisions that affect such areas as R&D investment tax credit, incentives affecting the formation of new companies, among others.  But in typical French manner, the ghost of Five Year Plans of yore would return in the much milder guise of Commissariat à la Prospective.

There are twenty two recommendations made in the report, ranging from broadening and codifying employee participation on corporate boards to ways of fostering innovation, rewarding long term portfolio investors, developing shale gas resources, etc.  Many of these recommendations should be studied in this country because we could benefit from them.

On a higher level, the Report is daunting.  It calls on the government to reduce public spending and it aims at reshaping the French industrial fabric: creating more mid-size companies (think of the German Mittelstand model) and pushing the sector up market where higher quality products permit higher profit margins (think LVMH, Sanofi- Aventis and, I wish, Delage and Delahaye instead of dreary Peugeot).  That is a very tall order, hence the deliberate step-by-22 steps approach.

Equally instructive, and courageous, is Gallois’ call to stimulate capital investment in industry, which in turns necessitates toning down overregulation and the demonization of executives.  This capitalization drive also requires greater stability in the relations with stakeholders which Gallois hopes to achieve by (1) offering greater employee participation in corporate decisions (up to four but in any case less than 1/3 of the board of director seats at companies with over 5,000 employees) and (2) stronger voice for long term shareholders (doubling of their votes after two years).

The initial French government reaction was typical: countering Gallois’ 22 recommendations with 35 proposals, yet watering and complicating the proposed key reduction in social charges.  As the Shadoks[2] of my youth used to say, GA BU ZO MEU, why make it simple if you can make it complicated.

France like the US is faced with mounting pressure to reform itself, yet neither country is on the cusp of the abyss.  Their respective governments have been divisive so that there is no popular consensus on the necessary reforms and shared sacrifices. Yet well connected outsiders (Gallois, Bowles, Simpson) have started to speak up.  In the days of instant communication and interconnected economies we should and need to pick what they have to say, wherever they may be domiciled.



[1]   Louis Gallois is a former CEO of Airbus, EADS, SNCF.
[2]  A popular and off-beat French TV series in the 1960s.

No comments:

Post a Comment