Two weeks, Robert Zoellick, the outgoing president of the World
Bank, advised European leaders to “break the glass” and get into emergency
salvage mode. A less violent option, but
one that would likely be just as effective, would be to make a single phone
call.
By that I mean calling former Tresaury Secretary Hank Paulson, granting
him dual US and Spanish citizenship and offering him the job of Secretario de
Hacienda of the Kingdom of Spain.
The latest saga of the Spanish banking sector bailout was in line
with previous efforts: vague, not definitive and indefinite as to the
timeline.
The Spanish government hired two consultants to assess the banking
sector’s capital needs. Two scenarios
were considered, a central one and a stressed one.
This move was precipitated by the very poor handling of the Bankia
bailout so far.
The results are in. Under
the base scenario, the banking system would need €16 to €25 billion; under the stressed one it would need €51- €62 billion. This is to compare with the IMF estimate of
at least €40 billion and the Eurozone members agreement to make available of up to €100 billion. Oh, one last
point, Spanish sovereign debt was to be a non factor in this study, a pretty
big fudge if there was one.
So, what then? Well, not
much really. The two government
officials presenting the results repeatedly referred to the consultants' as an “exercise” and
pointed out that under the central scenario there was no need for capital injection. Put it
another way, if the sun keeps shining, there is no need to buy an umbrella. Later, and
confusingly, Bankia announced that it would not need any public money even
under the stressed scenario (presumably, non-Spanish governments' money is not public money).
There was also no immediate call for action. The top three banks, BBVA, Santander and la Caixa,
didn’t need more capital under either scenario according to one of the
consultants. The Spanish government stated that
the problems were limited to the banks it had seized, that their auction would be postponed and that there likely would be no bank closing as this was
deemed too expensive an option. The
recapitalization numbers were not broken up by bank.
Bank-specific audits would be released by September 30. Then banks would submit their
recapitalization plans, and those that could access the markets (in whose judgment?) would be given
up to one year to comply. In other
words, the sector recapitalization could extend into late 2013 before it was
completed!
If this feels like a trip to Alice in Wonderland, it is because
it is. It is also an
accident waiting to happen.
Knowing what they know today, I am sure that Secretary Paulson (and the Fed) would handle the
Lehman crisis differently. But one weakness that Sec. Paulson doesn’t have
is being wishy-washy. In 2008, as panic gripped
the US markets, he swiftly convinced the President and Congress to recapitalize
our tops banks with government money. He
then proceeded to impose his decision on bank managements in one afternoon.
A few months later under the Obama Administration, credible stress tests
were conducted on the top US banks, the individual results were made public and
the banks wasted no time announcing voluntary recapitalizations. Over the 2008-2009 period, several very large
banks were closed and/or sold to financially solid competitors.
Having waited too long, Spain is now in a difficult position and
needs outside help to shore up its banks.
However, having admitted to weakness, Spain should take prompt and forceful action. Such decisiveness might even improve the terms of the bank bail out, making it more convincing and effective. I don’t know how good Sec. Paulson’s Spanish is,
but I think it is good enough. Make the
call!
No comments:
Post a Comment