Monday, April 22, 2019

Notre-Dame de Paris: ever standing and ever changing


When her roof became engulfed in flames and her spire toppled over, I couldn’t help remembering 9/11 and the Twin Towers collapsing under huge volutes of black smoke and flying debris.

Miraculously though the twin towers of Notre-Dame and much of her structure have survived this month’s fire.  The world now awaits and wonders how modern technologies will help restore this iconic monument.

We shouldn’t worry too much, for Notre-Dame has always found ways to survive disasters, adapt to successive crises and draw on human talents to stay forever young.

Consider her history.  Her construction started around 1162, under the reign of Louis VII, at a time when the king’s authority extended over a fraction of what is France today and was threatened by Henry II of England.

It took a century to complete her construction, mostly; by 1260, the first wooden central spire was erected, only to be taken down in 1790.  From the 14th to the 18th century, Notre-Dame was the scene of innumerable additions (new chapels, the great organ), interior redesigns, major repairs (twin towers, roof, buttresses), sloppy repainting and repurposing (the cathedral was twice used as a giant cemetery for royals and princes, and functioned as a food and wine depot during the Revolution of 1789).

After centuries of vandalism, haphazard redesigns and repairs, Victor Hugo published in 1831 his famous novel Notre-Dame de Paris and launched a nation-wide wave of support to restore the cathedral.

Then as today, captains of industry competed to fund this effort.  In 1845 architects Viollet-Leduc and Lassus submitted their project and won the right to implement it.  This would be the start of the most ambitious, comprehensive and, when Lassus died, unrestrained restoration project in Europe. 

Viollet-Leduc produced over 1,000 drawings and plans for Notre-Dame.  Deep down, he wanted to rebuild the cathedral as it should have been in the first place. 

His restoration project was extraordinarily thorough, touching all parts of the cathedral: statues, the spire, foundations, flying buttresses, the façade, the roof, the paint, the windows, etc. 

Viollet-Leduc’s imagination and ambition were boundless, as his drawing below of what Notre-Dame should look like shows.


After this massive undertaking, Notre-Dame was left more or less to herself until the 1960s when Culture minister André Malraux decided to clean her up, exposing for the first time in a century the exquisite details of her façade, sculptures and stone work.

Another period of benign neglect and meager restoration budgets ensued, until the recent fire.

Throughout her life, Notre-Dame has survived wars, revolutions, plagues, insurrections, fires and haphazard care.  She is now over 850 years old, and not a day older[1].  Time for a new make-over.  Time also to learn lessons from the past.



[1]  Much of the historical information was derived from a book by Jean-Louis Chardans.